Showing posts with label financial literacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label financial literacy. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2012


STUDENT LOAN DEBT INCREASES BY 47% FOR 35 T0 49 YEAR OLDS

The Great Recession has resulted in many unemployed middle age individuals going to College to obtain new knowledge and skills and hopefully a job.

Reuters recently reported on an analysis it did of 3 million credit reports on middle aged individuals (35-49 year old).   This group had a staggering 47% increase in student loan debt over the last three years.  Many middle age individuals without jobs go to college hoping that the new skills they obtain will result in a well paying job.  For some--this is a wise investment.  But others have taken on a large debt burden without a material increase in their job prospects. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/27/us-studentdebt-middleage-idUSTRE7BQ0T620111227




Friday, November 11, 2011

Education Secretary Wants FinLit Ed--No Press Coverage

On November 8, 2011, US Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan highlighted the importance of personal finance education in our K-12 schools and colleges at a meeting of  President Obama's Advisory Council on Financial Capability.  At the meeting, the Secretary of Education expressed powerful opinions on the need to have personal finance taught in our classrooms.  Here are a few of the things he is reported to have said:






I think the challenge we face now is that we don't have a financially literate population.
As important as reading and math and social studies and science, I think today more than ever financial literacy has to be a part of that.
To continue to have a population that is relatively illiterate in these matters I think has real negative consequences for our democracy.
If we don't do things differently we're going to perpetuate these problems.  This is not a place where we need to get a little bit better.  We've got to get a lot better, and we've got to get better faster.
I always think you have to start young.  So if this is just one course, half a semester [or] semester senior year, [it's] definitely late in the game.
I just really encourage the council to be extraordinarily bold, and to push us very, very hard.  Again, there are some problems where I think we're pretty close to solving them, we just need to tinker, and this is not one of those.  We have to get so much better.  We have a state of crisis here.  We have and emergency, and I feel this tremendous sense of urgency.
According to the press, Secretary Duncan noted that the lack of financial literacy was related to the mortgage crisis and low savings rate.  Secretary Duncan indicated that many individuals are not capable of making long term investment and retirement plans.  He stated that given dramatic shift in our society away from employer funded defined-benefit plans to self-funded and self-directed retirement savings plans like a 401k, there was increased urgency for this type of education in the classroom.


He noted that many teachers are not prepared to teach personal finance classes and that studies show they are not comfortable teaching these personal finance concepts.  He also explained that the Department of Education has little power today to mandate personal finance education in our schools today.


These are very important and powerful statements by a leading voice in education.  So who covered this event?  The New York Times?  The Washington Post?  The Chronicle of Higher Education?


None of these organizations apparently sent a report to this event, despite a media notice of the meeting and its purpose.  See:  http://www.ed.gov/news/media-advisories/education-secretary-deputy-treasury-secretary-highlight-importance-financial-e

So who reported on this important event--which to my knowledge is the most specific and in-depth statements made by the Secretary of Education on the topic of personal finance education in our schools?  Financial Planning magazine--a publication for financial advisers.  See: http://www.financial-planning.com/news/education-secretary-duncan-financial-literacy-education-2675914-1.html

And Yahoo News is the only other organization reporting the details of this meeting, but even this report is based on the Financial Planning article.  http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/duncan-calls-personal-finance-lessons-starting-kindergarten-134427341.html


How can we solve the problem of the lack of personal finance education in our schools and colleges if the national media fails to report on these very important comments by the Secretary of Education?

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Why Obama is Changing Student Loans Programs

Summary:


Why did the Obama administration make changes to the federal student loan program?  They are responding to the following concerns:

  1. The cost of going to college appears to be increasing by more than inflation for the last three decades;
  2. Despite the cost increase--going to college is still a good deal for most--but not as good as it used to be;
  3. Many students are taking out more in loans each year to attend college;
  4. Student loan default rates are up;
  5. The unemployment rate for recent college graduates is more than double the rate for all college graduates;
  6. Starting salaries for recent college graduates, adjusted for inflation, are down over the last decade;
  7. College students and their parents vote in elections;
  8. This is why college students and recent college graduates are Occupying Wall Street.



*********************************************************************************

President Obama announced some significant changes to the federal student loan program today.  The major changes include:
  • allowing an estimated 6 million people who hold both direct government student loans and government backed private loans the ability to consolidate these debts into one government loan--it is anticipated that this could result in the reduction of the annual interest paid on these loans by an average of 0.50%; and
  • moving up the start date of a program already approved by Congress that caps monthly student-loan payments for borrowers with low incomes from 2014 to 2012.  Existing rules allow borrowers to limit their loan payments to 15% of income, with all debt forgiven after 25 years of payment.  The new rules would cap loan payments to 10% of income, with all debt forgiven after 20 years of payment.  This new Pay As You Earn program could help 1.6 million existing students and recent graduates.

Also today the Department of Education and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced that they were teaming up to launch a new "Know Before You Owe" project aimed at creating a financial aid shopping sheet which colleges and universities could use to better help students understand the type and amount of aid they qualify for and easily compare aid packages offered by different institutions.  For an example of what this financial aid shopping sheet could look like go to: http://www.consumerfinance.gov/static/students/disclosure.pdf

Why does the Obama administration believe these new programs and policies needed?  Student loan debt and college tuition rates increase at rates much greater than inflation. Unemployment rates are up dramatically for recent college graduates.   Many college graduates have taken whatever job is available to pay the bills --the business student as waitress and the law student as bartender.  Not surprisingly, given the job situation for many recent graduates, student loan default rates are up quite a bit since 2007.  Lastly, incomes are down on an inflation adjusted basis (unlike tuition) for recent college graduates.  It is really quite simple--higher college costs and fewer, lower paying jobs makes paying back student loans difficult.  This is why many young people are Occupying Wall Street.

Take a look at this chart created by Mark Perry a Professor of economics at the University of Michigan (for the whole article go to:  http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2011/07/higher-education-bubble-college-tuition.html):

Wow--College Tuition is going up at a faster rate than health care!
This chart shows college tuition rising by by 7.45% a year from 1978 to 2011 compared to a 5.8% annual rise in medical care costs.  As you can see from the new home data in the chart--the housing bubble's home price increases pale in comparison to the price increases in college and health care.  However, it is important to remember that the housing industry, with housing being the single largest asset owned by most individuals, is a much more significant part of our economy than health care or universities and colleges. 

Many point out that college tuition and fee rates that are published by colleges dramatically overstate the amount of tuition actually paid by students and graduates.  Many who go to college receive Pell Grants and other scholarships that materially decrease the tuition sticker price.  The sticker price is what a minority of students actually pay for college.  These are valid points, however it doesn't negate the fact that the college tuition sticker price has nearly tripled, after adjusting for inflation, over the past 30 years.  The fact that discounting off the sticker price exists doesn't prove that the net cost of going to college isn't increasing at a rate greater than overall inflation.  Although I cannot prove that net college costs are increasing much quicker than other costs, I would venture that such an impression is held by most of our citizens.  The Pew Research Center recently conducted a poll and asked if college is affordable today--only 22% agreed that is was (see:  http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2011/05/15/is-college-worth-it/2/).


I believe that going to college is definitely worth the investment.  I realize there is a debate that some want to have about the economic value of a college degree.  It should not come as a surprise that this exact topic was also debated during the Great Depression in the 1930s.  It is easy to question the economic value of a degree if you can't find a job when you graduate or if you are forced to take a job that does not require a college degree.  I very much agree that college is still a very good investment despite the increase in costs.  The following charts below do a great job of proving the huge economic benefits to an individual of a college degree:


http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_chart_001.htm




http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/25/why-college-brings-a-huge-return/


http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/25/why-college-brings-a-huge-return/


What do these chart tell us?  Basically having a college degree will give you an opportunity to make much more income and greatly reduces the likelihood that you will become unemployed.  The charts support the argument that an investment in higher education will pay back great returns over your working life time.  In fact, the typical full-time worker with a four-year degree is earning 65% more a year than a high school graduate.  Recent unemployment figures show that the unemployment rate for a college graduate is 4.2% versus and 9.7% for someone that has a high school degree.   However, one of the problem with these statistics is that they include all adult college graduates over many decades.  They really don't answer the question of what is likely to happen to a young person that is graduating from a four year college in 2012 or what has happened to someone who graduated during the Great Recession that began in 2007.  What is likely to happen to them?

Many young people continue to take on new debt every year to pay for college.  In fact the amount of student loans taken out each year has doubled over the past decade and exceeded $100 billion for the first time in 2010 (see the chart below).  In 2011 the total amount of student loans outstanding is expected to exceed $1 trillion.  In 2010 the amount of student loans outstanding exceeded credit card debt outstanding--historically student loan debt was a fraction of credit card debt.    

The expectations of many undergraduates have changed dramatically since they started college.  Let me tell you the story of one young man (let's call him Jack) that I know who is a senior today but started as a freshman a few weeks prior to the collapse of Lehman Brothers.  Jack's economic deal was that his parents would cover 60% of his net tuition cost and he would pay 40%.  But the Great Recession changed the deal.  His father was in the construction industry.  His parents for the first three years of college could only cover 40% of the tuition and in his senior year could not help at all. Instead of graduating with less than $40,000 in student loans he will likely have more than $80,000 in debt.  Each year Jack's parents thought things would get better and that they would be able to contribute more--but that did not happen.  I think there are many students in the Class of 2012 who had their "deal" changed.  Parent, grandparents, uncles and aunts as a result of the Great Recession we not able to help out as much as they expected.  And the summer jobs they hoped to get did not appear. 

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that more than "14% of Americans between 25 and 34 (5.9 million) are living with their parents, up significantly from before the recession.  Nearly a quarter of them have bachelor's degrees." This was not what many of these parents were hoping for when they dropped their children off at college freshman year. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204505304576654842642615166.html?mod=ITP_pageone_1  



Every type of consumer debt outstanding is down since the Lehman Brother collapse except for student loans which are up over 25% since the fourth quarter of 2008.  In 2009 the average college debt for a graduating senior with debt was $24,000 and the average graduating senior debt number had increase by approximately 6% a year since 2005 (according to the Project for Student Debt http://projectonstudentdebt.org/files/pub/classof2009.pdf ). 



In 2010 that the total amount of student loans outstanding exceeded the amount of credit card debt outstanding for the first time ever.






Student loan default rates have increased materially as a result of the Great Depression.



Students graduating with a college degrees since the Great Recession are finding it more difficult to find a job than they did prior to the Lehman Brothers failure.  Don Peck, a features editor at The Atlantic, in his recent book "Pinched, How the Great Recession Has Narrowed Our Futures & What We Can Do About It" explains some of the problems faced by recent college graduates.  He notes that "Young adults with college and graduate degrees are doing much better than those without; for 2010 as a whole, the unemployment rate among sixteen- to twenty-four-year-olds was 9.4 percent for four-year college graduates, 22.5 percent for those with only a high-school diploma, and 31.5 percent for high-school dropouts."  The Wall Street Journal reports that the "unemployment rate for recent college graduates is grads is 10.7%."  That article also notes that the current unemployment rate for all four year college graduates is 4.2%.  That means that recent college graduates are 2.5 times more likely to be unemployed than all college graduates.  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204505304576654842642615166.html?mod=ITP_pageone_1    

The recently graduated are having greater difficulty getting a job compared to other older college graduates in the work force.  Don Peck also notes in his book that "According to the National Association of Colleges and Employers, job offers to graduating seniors declined by 21 percent in 2009.  They rebounded by 5% in 2010 and are expected to rise again in 2011, but not by nearly as much as they've fallen." 

Lastly, we know that when adjusted for inflation median incomes of recent graduates with a bachelor's degree has fallen by nearly 10% in the past decade, and so has the median income of all families headed by a person with a bachelors degree: